SubscribeLog in
Connect with us

China Society

Explaining the Bu Xiaohua Case: How One Woman’s Disappearance Captured Nationwide Attention in China

This is why Bu Xiaohua’s 13-year disappearance became such a major topic of discussion on Chinese social media.

Manya Koetse

Published

on

PREMIUM CONTENT

The story of Bu Xiaohua, a Chinese MA graduate who was reunited with her family after disappearing for 13 years, has recently dominated discussions on Weibo. Her case reveals much more than just the mystery of her disappearance—it highlights systemic failures and the vulnerability of women in rural China. Here, we unpack the key aspects of her story.

Her name is Bu Xiaohua (卜小花), but for the past 13.5 years, she lived a life without that name and without any connection to the person she once was.

The story of this Chinese female MA graduate from Shanxi’s Jinzhong, born on September 1, 1979, who disappeared for over a decade and was recently found living in a village just a 2.5-hour drive from her hometown, has sparked widespread discussion on Weibo and beyond. We previously explained the story in our article here.

In brief: On November 25, 2024, a woman from Heshun County (和顺县) sought help from volunteer Zhu Yutang (朱玉堂), who focuses on reuniting families with missing loved ones, to trace the origins of her “aunt,” who had been living with her uncle Zhang Ruijun (张瑞军) for over a decade. During this time, they had multiple children together, despite the woman clearly suffering from mental illness.

As volunteer groups and authorities got involved, it was eventually revealed that the woman was Bu Xiaohua (卜小花), an MA graduate from Jinzhong who had disappeared after experiencing a schizophrenic episode in the spring of 2011. Bu was found looking emaciated, bewildered, and unkempt, and was soon reunited with her family, who immediately ensured she received the help she needed. During a medical check-up, she was found to be not only suffering from mental illness but also from malnourishment.

Bu Xiaohua in the Zhang family home.

When volunteers first met with Bu, they tried to get her to speak and learn more about her background. Among other things, she also wrote down several clues that led to the discovery of her identity, such as the names of family members. The first thing she wrote down was “run” (跑).

The note by Bu Xiaohua provided many clues about her life prior to being “taken in.”

As discussions about Bu’s disappearance continue, several aspects of this case have become focal points, highlighting the vulnerable position of Bu and many other women like her.

 

1. “收留”: Was She “Taken In” or Abducted?

 

One term that frequently comes up in discussions around Bu Xiaohua’s case is “收留” (shōu liú), meaning “to take in” or “give shelter.”

This term was used in various reports about Bu’s story, including in the first police report of December 3.

Police report of December 3, 2024, using the word “taking in.”

Many netizens pointed out that the initial police statement seemed to frame the situation as an act of human compassion, reflecting the niece’s account of how Ms. Bu allegedly “wandered” into their family home one day. The family claims they reported her to the police but eventually decided to “take her in.”

Netizens are outraged by the use of this term, as it glosses over the criminal responsibility of Zhang and his family, who essentially kept Bu Xiaohua away from her own family for over 13 years. They are accused of exploiting her mental illness and inability to consent to marriage or sexual relations, which resulted in multiple children. The exact number is unclear, though rumors suggest she had six children in total, with only two remaining in her care.

The oldest of the two children is already twelve, meaning she must have become pregnant not too long after going missing.

Some commenters have referred to this as “rape-style sheltering” (“强奸型收留”). Was it rape, human trafficking, or illegal detention?

While netizens speculated about the actual crime behind this “taking in” of a mentally ill woman, local police announced they had opened a criminal investigation into suspected illegal acts. Bu’s “husband” has since been detained, and officials are continuing to investigate the case.

No evidence or clues of Bu being trafficked have been found as of now. Investigations into the case reveal that Bu – displaying signs of mental illness according to witnesses – was alone when she walked around neighboring villages for at least ten days in July and August of 2011, some weeks after she disappeared from her home.

Bu and “husband” Zhang at her reunion with family.

The hashtags “Taking In” (#收留#) and “‘Taking In’ Shouldn’t Be Used as a Cover for Unlawful Realities” (#收留之名难掩不法之实#) have been used by netizens to protest the phrase’s use.

Online image showing all kinds of weords, from ‘human trafficking’ to ‘violence’ to shape the characters for the neutral word of ‘taking in.’

Meanwhile, some reports on the misuse of the term have been censored. The Weibo hashtag “Taking In the Female MA Graduate” (#收留女硕士#) has been taken offline and comes up with a “Sorry, the content of this topic is not displayed” message. A QQ News article titled “Female Master’s Graduate Missing for 13 Years Has Given Birth to a Son and a Daughter; The Person Who ‘Took Her In’ Responds: ‘I Didn’t Detain or Hit Her'” (“女硕士走失13年已生育一儿一女,“收留者”本人回应”) also now leads to a ‘404 page,’ indicating it has been removed.

Critics like Lawyer Zhao (@披荆斩棘赵律师), who has actively commented on this case, believe that Bu’s “husband” and his family never made any real effort to help her find her own family. They speculate that the family only agreed to let volunteers get involved because Bu’s childbearing value had long been exhausted, or because she was aging and they no longer wanted to care for her.

Zhang’s niece, whose request to volunteers initially brought this story to light, has also become an increasingly controversial figure. She recently hosted a livestream in which she claimed that the Zhang family had actually taken good care of Bu, describing her as a “good-for-nothing” who neither did housework nor fed her own children. She also defended her impoverished and disabled unlce Zhang, claiming the family is not as bad as the public says.

“Let her experience being ‘taken in’ by another family and see how she feels,” some top commenters suggested in response.

 

2. Lacking Law Enforcement: Systematic Failures Exposed

 

The outrage over the term “taking in” is directly tied to anger over inadequate law enforcement regarding the protection of women in rural China.

Years ago, local police in Heshun County, where Zhang’s family lives, were already aware of a mentally unstable woman being “taken into” a man’s home and giving birth to his children. After all, both children had a hukou (household registration). Chinese media report that police officers visited the home multiple times and allegedly continued efforts to search for her family, which indicates they understood her situation. People wonder how they could let this go on, given Zhang’s continued sexual relations with her—wouldn’t that constitute rape?

Female commenter and author Zheng Yuchuan (@郑渝川) suggested that Bu’s case is particularly troubling because of systematic failure at all levels. She wrote:

Despite population censuses, pandemic prevention measures like mass nucleic acid testing and vaccinations, as well as the issuance of birth certificates, household registrations, and school admission procedures for the two children—every single step was carried out flawlessly. Isn’t this the biggest joke within the current institutional system?

Although there are reports emphasizing the continued efforts of the police to find Bu’s family, many netizens aren’t convinced: “Why is it that the police took blood samples and conducted facial recognition comparisons, yet after 13 years, they achieved nothing? Meanwhile, a volunteer, using just a bit of intelligence, managed to make her write down some names, and this bizarre case was solved.”

Law blogger Zhang San (@张三同学) commented: “A single crime pollutes a river; a single act of unjust law enforcement pollutes the entire water source.”

 

3. A Brilliant Mind: Bu Xiaohua’s Academic Achievements

 

Another recurring topic is Bu’s academic achievements before her life with the Zhang family. Bu was a student in Yanshan University’s (燕山大学) Mechanics and Engineering program, a prestigious major.

In 2004, she wrote a thesis titled “Temperature Field of a Thin Plate with Curved Cracks During Electrothermal Crack Arrest” (带有曲线裂纹薄板电热止裂时的温度场). Her 2006 thesis was “Small Bending Deformation of an Elastic Thin Plate Under Continuous Transverse Flow-Around Conditions” (不间断横向绕流条件下弹性薄板的小弯曲变形). She obtained her MA degree in 2008.

Bu had planned to continue in academia, but due to an expired ID card, she was unable to register for her Ph.D. exam—a setback that marked the beginning of her rapidly deteriorating mental health. This eventually led to her leaving her home one day in 2011, vanishing without a trace, and ending up in her dire situation with the Zhang family.

Bu Xiaohua’s diploma

Her education is significant to the story in many ways. First, it serves as an important bridge to her past. One of her former professors, the 82-year-old Bai Xiangzhong (白象忠), was one of the names Bu first wrote on a note when volunteers from the missing persons organization came to her house and asked her about her life.

The name of Professor Bai Xiangzhong is one of the names Bu wrote down on a memo in the presence of volunteers trying to learn more about her life.

In recent news, it became known that Bai Xiangzhong learned of Bu’s story and was moved to tears upon hearing about her circumstances.

Bu’s education is also an important part of her identity. Recent videos showed Bu reading a book and pushing back her glasses—which she hadn’t had for 13.5 years—as if it was the most normal thing in the world.

Recent videos showed Bu reading a book and pushing back her glasses—which she hadn’t had for 13.5 years—as if it was the most normal thing in the world.

One popular Weibo blogger (@我不是谦哥儿) wrote:

More than the Master’s degree she obtained years ago, it’s this natural skill [the way she reads and pushes back her glasses] in which we can directly observe and vividly feel the life she had. We can feel that, if it were not for the dusky farmhouse in the mountainous area where she got trapped, there would have been an entirely different possibility [for her life].

But her education is also significant in other ways. It shows that it is not just low-income, less-educated, rural women who can become victims of rape and human trafficking, but that even women with a university degree can end up in such situations.

 

4. Bu Xiaohua’s Case: A Reflection of Larger Social Issues

 

In the end, the story of Bu Xiaohua is attracting so much attention because she represents much more than just herself.

One of the most well-known stories similar to hers is that of Xiao Huamei (小花梅), the mother of eight children who was found tied to a shed in Xuzhou in 2022. After her story became a major trending topic on Chinese social media, local authorities launched a thorough investigation and uncovered the woman’s true identity. They found that she had been a victim of human trafficking back in 1998.

Like Bu, Xiao Huamei also suffered from mental illness. And similar to Bu’s case, local authorities failed to step in. The family received subsidies, and local officials approved the marriage between the mentally ill woman and her husband, Dong Zhimin, who was later sentenced to prison for his involvement in the human trafficking case.

This all brings back associations with the Chinese film Blind Mountain (盲山, 2007). Directed by Li Yang (李杨), the movie revolves around Bai Xuemei (白雪梅), a recent college graduate who is tricked into traveling to a remote mountain village under the pretense of securing a job. Once there, she is drugged, kidnapped, and sold into a forced marriage with a rural farmer. Trapped in the isolated and impoverished village, she faces constant physical and psychological abuse from her “husband,” his family, and even the local community, who see her captivity as normal or necessary. Despite multiple attempts to escape, she is repeatedly caught and encounters indifference or complicity from those around her, including the police. She is only rescued years later.

From Blind Mountain (2007).

Films such as Blind Mountain and the 2022 case of Xiao Huamei have helped create more awareness of the vulnerable position of Chinese women in rural areas, particularly those dealing with mental or physical disabilities. Last year, a marriage in Henan was denied after a local official found the woman, who was deaf and mute, had not learned sign language and could not write (read more).

But the problem persists. China, particularly its rural villages, faces a shortage of women stemming from the decades-long one-child policy and a traditional preference for boys. This has been further exacerbated by women migrating out of villages in search of better prospects. As a result, many rural single men are unable to marry, especially when they face additional challenges such as poverty or disability. Since marriage and children are considered social norms, these men and their families are often willing to take drastic measures. This situation has fueled the human trafficking of women for forced marriage in China since the 1980s.

“Why not re-release Blind Mountain?” some wonder. “It feels so relevant today.”

As for Bu, she is currently doing well given the circumstances. Her brother, who searched for her for so many years, is determined to take care of his sister. “My little sister is the treasure of our entire family,” he recently said. “Every day that I am on this earth is a day that I will take care of her.”

By Manya Koetse
(follow on X, LinkedIn, or Instagram)

Spotted a mistake or want to add something? Please let us know in comments below or email us. First-time commenters, please be patient – we will have to manually approve your comment before it appears.

©2024 Whatsonweibo. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce our content without permission – you can contact us at info@whatsonweibo.com.

Follow What’s on Weibo on

Manya is the founder and editor-in-chief of What's on Weibo, offering independent analysis of social trends, online media, and digital culture in China for over a decade. Subscribe to gain access to content, including the Weibo Watch newsletter, which provides deeper insights into the China trends that matter. More about Manya at manyakoetse.com or follow on X.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

China Society

China Trend Watch Top 10: Putin & Kim Jong-un in Beijing, Meituan’s Upcoming Changes, Lu Xun’s Mural Controversy

From Kim Jong-un in Beijing to Lu Xun’s cigarette: what China’s talking about this week – a top 10 by What’s on Weibo.

Manya Koetse

Published

on

 

🔥What’s on Weibo’s Top 10: What’s Trending in China This Week (Week 35, 2025) Stay updated with China Trend Watch by What’s on Weibo — your quick overview of what’s trending on Weibo and across other Chinese social media. Trending topics curated by me, with help from my customized What’s on Weibo AI sidekick.

 

1. Putin and Kim Jong-un to Attend China’s WWII Victory Commemoration

[#普京和金正恩等出席抗战纪念活动#] [#26位外国元首和首脑出席抗战纪念活动#] (Weibo)

These days, the upcoming September 3rd military parade is trending virtually every day on Chinese social media. On August 28, it was announced that Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un are both among 26 foreign heads of state and government leaders expected to attend China’s commemorative event marking the 80th anniversary of victory in the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II. Leaders from countries including Cambodia, Vietnam, Iran, and Cuba are on the guest list, underscoring China’s global alliances amid tense geopolitical climates.

Manya’s Take: That Putin would attend the upcoming major parade is no surprise, but the presence of Kim Jong-un is more noteworthy—especially alongside other confirmed attendees, including leaders from Indonesia, Pakistan, Nepal, Iran, Myanmar, Malaysia, Vietnam, and others. At the same time, there is a clear absence of leaders from Western countries. According to state-linked Weibo commentator “Zhu Tianxia” (@煮天下), there is strong historical justification for Kim’s attendance. Yet he also emphasized that Trump’s absence is a loss for Washington, given Trump’s repeated statements that he wished to meet Kim, while US–Russia diplomatic efforts to end the war in Ukraine have so far yielded little progress. This makes the gathering of Xi, Putin, and Kim Jong-un in the heart of Beijing not just a commemorative event but a symbolic ‘win’ for China, underscoring its ever-growing and shifting role on the global stage.

2. ‘Not the Zong Fuli Era’: Zong Fuli on Wahaha Leadership After Zong Qinghou

[#宗馥莉谈民营企业接班#] [#宗馥莉回应娃哈哈争议问题#] (Weibo)

On the first anniversary of her appointment as chairwoman of the Chinese food & beverage producer Wahaha Group (娃哈哈集团), Zong Fuli (宗馥莉, also known as Kelly Zong) gave an exclusive interview to Caijing (财经) magazine where she addressed succession, leadership challenges, and public controversies. Responding to the label of the Wahaha Group being in its “Zong Fuli Era” (宗馥莉时代), she dismissed the notion, emphasizing that a company belongs to “everyone who works hard within it,” not just a single individual. In the interview, Zong also spoke more about her views on running Wahaha, advocating long-term strategic growth over short-term results, and sharing her determination to not let controversy distract her from business operations.

Manya’s Take:
Zong Fuli has big shoes to fill. Her father, Wahaha founder and chairman Zong Qinghou (宗庆后), was one of China’s most beloved and respected businessmen. Since his passing in March 2024, Zong has also faced one controversy after another — from outsourcing some of Wahaha’s production to a cheaper water brand, to a high-profile family inheritance dispute involving three alleged illegitimate children living in the US. These issues have dented the company’s brand image. Her latest interview is therefore a timely one, in which Zong demonstrates resilience and determination to keep this much-loved Chinese brand thriving. Especially the fact that she’s staying humble (not wanting this to be he ‘Zong Fuli era’, is something many consumers are likely to appreciate, as humbleness was one of the reasons why people loved Zong Qinghou so much. Is it enough to undo the harm done to Wahaha’s brand image? Perhaps not, but it’s certainly a step in the right direction.

3. Meituan To Scrap Late-Delivery Fines By End-2025

[#美团将于年底全面取消超时扣款#](Weibo)

An internal briefing from Chinese food delivery company Meituan (美团) said the platform will eliminate “overtime” penalties for delivery riders by the end of 2025. The company also highlighted “rider-friendly communities” (骑手友好社区) to ease entry to residential compounds via data-linked QR access; 24,700+ communities across 150 cities have reportedly been upgraded. The move follows long-running public concern over rider safety and algorithmic pressures. Many users welcomed the change while asking how timeliness metrics and customer expectations will be managed without fines.

Manya’s Take: In recent years, there has been more attention to the hardships faced by Chinese food delivery workers. Not only do they face many hard or unsafe circumstances while doing their job—from hot weather and thunderstorms to roads or communities that are difficult to enter—but their daily work is also monitored by algorithmic management tools that put extreme pressure on them to deliver their orders on time. Riders can get caught in “algorithm traps” (算法陷阱) because the faster they work, the stricter the algorithm tightens delivery windows, and they may face penalties or reduced earnings if they fail to meet the expected times. Although the cancellation of the late fees is good for drivers, many consumers are skeptical, arguing that their Meituan deliveries are already taking a lot of time—with late fees being canceled, people fear it will only take longer. With Meituan now facing fierce competition from others, including JD and Eleme, the new measure might end up working against Meituan in the food delivery war.

ALSO TRENDING & NOTEWORTHY:

4. Man Wearing Horror Mask on Highway Sparks Public Outrage

[#高速有人戴恐怖面具吓车#](Weibo)

A video went viral on Weibo these days showing a man wearing a horror mask on the Changshen Expressway (长深高速), allegedly scaring nearby vehicles. The incident occurred on August 24 and was captured by another driver who claimed the masked man was intentionally frightening passengers. After an investigation, Hangzhou traffic police identified the individual as Hugo, a 42-year-old foreign teacher in Hangzhou, who was a passenger and claimed the mask was a spontaneous joke while retrieving snacks in the car. Police determined the act did not constitute a criminal offense but noted it could affect road safety. Although the incident triggered some online debates over road behavior and safety, many netizens also commented that the fuss was exaggerated given the lack of malicious intent or actual danger caused. But we do wonder if Hugo got into trouble at school 😂

The masked man that triggered controversy.

5. Shenzhen’s 12,000-Drone Light Show for 45th Anniversary

[#深圳1.2万架无人机灯光秀闪耀夜空#] [#今晚的深圳人都在抬头看#] (Weibo)

On August 26, Shenzhen celebrated the 45th anniversary of its Special Economic Zone with a record-breaking drone light show featuring 12,000 drones in a dual-venue performance at Renmin Square (市民广场) and Talent Park (人才公园). The show incorporated interactivity with the city lights and featured global artistic collaborations to tell a symbolic story about the history and transformation of the Special Economic Zone. The show drew tens of thousands residents and visitors from outside of Shenzhen, with some queuing five hours in advance. You can watch the full show here.

6. Xi Jinping Meets Cambodian Royalty Ahead of Anniversary

[#习近平夫妇会见柬埔寨国王西哈莫尼#] (Weibo)

President Xi Jinping and First Lady Peng Liyuan met with Cambodian King Norodom Sihamoni and Queen Mother Monineath at Zhongnanhai on August 26. Xi invited King Sihamoni to attend China’s upcoming Tiananmen parade for the 80th anniversary of the victory in the War of Resistance Against Japan and World War II. The visit is part of ongoing efforts to deepen the “ironclad” friendship between China and Cambodia.

7. Lu Xun Smoking Mural To Stay At Shaoxing Tourist Site

[#鲁迅夹烟形象墙画不会换#](Weibo)

A mural depicting Chinese famous writer Lu Xun (鲁迅) holding a cigarette at his native place in Shaoxing has sparked debate after a citizen petitioned for its replacement over youth influence concerns. Site staff clarified the mural will not be changed. The discussion touches on historical authenticity versus public health messaging in cultural heritage spaces. Many commenters argued the depiction reflects the era and the author’s real-life image, while others called for more youth-oriented guidance nearby.

Manya’s Take: Lu Xun (1881–1936) was known for his heavy smoking, which ultimately contributed to his early death. There are many images of him holding a cigarette, and today this has sparked more discussion among younger generations who are increasingly aware of the dangers of smoking, with more people actively involved in efforts to discourage it. The debate around Lu Xun and his cigarette is perhaps comparable to Walt Disney. It is known that photos of Disney at Disneyland were retouched to remove his cigarette, in order to hide his habit from the children visiting the park—a decision that remains somewhat controversial. In the end, Lu Xun is not Walt Disney, and his legacy is not about being a role model for children but about being a major cultural figure in early 20th-century China. In this context, smoking should neither be romanticized nor censored. Instead, Lu Xun’s heavy smoking—reportedly as many as 50 cigarettes a day!—should also serve as a warning about how harmful smoking is. Lu Xun died at just 56, and he smoked until the very end of his life.

The controversial Lu Xun mural.

8. Esther Yu Surrounded by Controversy, Public Calls for Transparency

[#虞书欣风波事关国有资产应有通报#] [#虞书欣风波不能只靠粉丝大字报澄清#] (Weibo)

The hugely popular Chinese actress Esther Yu / Yu Shuxin (虞书欣) is at the center of a growing public controversy. She’s lost more than 720,000 followers in just one week after two issues resurfaced. First, an old reality show clip went viral showing her making harsh remarks about co-star Zhang Haoyue (张昊玥). More significantly, Chinese financial blogger “Lao Pan Caishang” (老潘财商) accused Yu’s father of funneling RMB 1.5 billion in state funds through private companies and possibly committing tax fraud or falsifying financial data. Combined with reports about her family’s wealth and legal troubles, netizens are now questioning whether Yu’s career was helped by improper financial backing. While the original allegations surfaced months ago, *Jimu News* is now calling for Yu’s team—and state authorities—to publicly address the matter and provide transparency.

9. “Middle-Class Darling” MUJI Faces Mass Closures Across China

[#无印良品全国多地关店#] [#无印良品回应闭店潮#] (Weibo)

Japanese lifestyle brand MUJI (无印良品) is facing a “closure wave” across China, shutting down numerous stores in cities including Beijing, Shanghai, Suzhou, Wuhan, and Changsha. Multiple branch managers cited declining foot traffic and reduced profitability. In response, MUJI’s official statement described these closures as a “normal operational adjustment.” Yet for many, the downsizing of what was once considered the “white moonlight of the middle class” (中产的白月光)—a hugely popular symbol of minimalist, middle-class lifestyle—is noteworthy. The news trended alongside reports of liquidation discounts and local store shutdowns. Quality controversies, such as a student scissors product failing safety inspections, have previously added pressure to MUJI’s reputation in China. Reactions are mixed: while some express continued love for MUJI, others complain that it is more expensive in China than in Japan, despite being manufactured locally.

10. Southwest University Faces Backlash Over “Food Delivery Monopoly”

[#西南大学外卖垄断#] [#西南大学外卖风波#] (Weibo)

Southwest University (西南大学) has sparked heated debate among students after announcing that the so-called “Xiaoshenghuo” (校生活) app (the “Campus Life” app) would become the sole authorized food delivery platform on campus. Under the new policy, outside couriers from food delivery companies like Meituan and Ele.me can no longer enter dormitory zones, with orders funneled through the designated app for secondary delivery to pickup lockers. The university said the change was meant to fix problems of lost or misplaced orders, but students worry about reduced choice, higher prices, and poorer efficiency. Reports note that the chosen company previously faced fines for food safety compliance failures, further intensifying suspicions of unfair contracting. Student feedback highlights longer delivery times, fewer restaurant options, and hidden costs—raising concerns that the school’s management measures are edging into monopoly territory.

The China Trend Watch series combines AI-powered trend detection with editorial curation. AI tools — set up and customized by What’s on Weibo — help identify top trends and draft outlines, while Manya Koetse selects what’s most noteworthy, fact-checks, rewrites, and edits for context.

Continue Reading

China Society

Online Debates About China’s Train Traditions: No More Instant Noodles or Cigarette Breaks?

There’s talk of a ‘de-instant-noodling’ of China’s high-speed trains, but many netizens think smoking on the platform is the stinkier problem.

Manya Koetse

Published

on

For many Chinese train travelers, especially those going long distances and spending entire days or nights on the train, an easy instant noodle (pào miàn 泡面) meal and a quick cigarette break on the platform during a short stop are standard — even indispensable — parts of the journey.

But some changes may be on the horizon. Over the past few days, heated discussions on Chinese social media have focused on the future of these train “traditions.”

Instant noodles on long-distance trains have been a common way to eat since the early 1990s. Trains usually provide free boiling water to cook the noodles, making them a convenient way to have a hot meal for lunch or dinner — and much cheaper than the boxed rice meals offered on board.

Image via @人民网评.

This month, Guangzhou East Railway Station, along with Baiyun Railway Station, suddenly stopped selling instant noodles in station shops. The change, implemented in August, triggered the so-called “Railway Instant Noodles Debate” (高铁泡面话题).

According to reports, the decision is tied to nationwide railway efforts to “maintain cleanliness” in stations and on trains, and to provide passengers with “higher-quality service.”

Further adding to the unrest is the fact that the China Railway travel guide also advices passengers to avoid eating strongly odorous foods such as “durian, instant noodles” during their travels. Whereas regular instant noodles can be brought on board, they’re officially not recommended to eat. Durian and stinky tofu are not allowed, along with self-heating hotpots, which can trigger smoke alarms.

The phrase “High-speed railways are de-instant-noodling” (#高铁去泡面化#) trended on Weibo.

Although official railway customer service stated they have not received any notice about an official, nationwide ban on instant noodle sales in high-speed rail stations, the topic still generated major discussion.

At the core of the debate is this contradiction: everyone enjoys eating their own noodles on the train, but many people hate the smell of other people’s noodles. Beyond the strong smell, people walking through the carriage with their hot noodles also pose a safety hazard (not to mention the mess when someone accidentally drops their cup noodles).

 
Smoking on Train Platforms: The Stinkier Problem?
 

The noodle debate soon expanded into another topic: smoking on train platforms. Many netizens argue that smoking on platforms is a far more pressing issue than passengers eating noodles (#高铁站台禁烟比禁止吃泡面更紧迫#), as cigarette smoking before/during travel on the outside train platforms causes a real nuisance for people who just want some fresh air.

It’s clearly a hot topic these days, with various related hashtags going trending. One media post about banning smoking on platforms vs. banning noodles on trains received nearly 80,000 likes and thousands of comments.

In China, it’s very common for passengers to take a quick cigarette break on the platform before the train continues.

In the past, people smoked on the trains themselves, especially in the areas between carriages. Since 2014, however, smoking has been banned on all high-speed and regular trains.

Since 2022, the ban has extended to all other passenger trains, waiting halls, and indoor areas of railway stations.

Outdoor platforms remain the last tolerated place to smoke before a long journey or during a short stop.

But for many non-smokers, this practice is bothersome, as the lingering smell leaves them no smoke-free area to wait for boarding.

Lately, anti-smoking influencers have gained traction in China, posting videos of themselves confronting smokers in public. Applauded by some and criticized by others, this trend has further fueled the platform-smoking debate.

As part of this anti-smoking movement, more people are calling out the lack of enforcement of smoking bans in public areas.

Still, opinions remain divided. Many netizens dislike smoke on train platforms, but argue it would be difficult to enforce a ban outdoors. If platforms are banned, they say, then pedestrian streets, shopping districts, and other outdoor public spaces should be too.

In the end, though opinions vary, most people agree on one thing: the smell of noodles on a train can sometimes be unpleasant, but it’s nothing compared to the smell of cigarette smoke. For now, the majority of Chinese netizens seem to favor a smoking ban on train platforms over a “de-noodling” of the trains.

“The only thing I dislike about the smell of noodles is that it makes me regret not buying some myself,” one commenter wrote.

Another worried Xiaohongshu user wrote: “A train ride without the noodles is only half as fun!”

For now, passengers don’t need to worry about losing their much-beloved train noodles just yet. Whether or not station shops sell instant noodles, travelers can still bring their own as long as official regulations still allow it (and they do).

If you really want to play it safe: bring your own noodles but eat them in the train’s dining carriage, which also allows people to eat self-brought food.

And for those who want a quick smoke on the platform—it’s also still possible, though perhaps not for long.

By Manya Koetse

(follow on X, LinkedIn, or Instagram)

Spotted a mistake or want to add something? Please let us know in comments below or email us. First-time commenters, please be patient – we will have to manually approve your comment before it appears.

©2025 Whatsonweibo. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce our content without permission – you can contact us at info@whatsonweibo.com.

Follow What’s on Weibo on

Continue Reading

Popular Reads