Global Times Responds to China’s Recent Online News Media Censorship
Chinese internet regulators have fined and shut down several major news site webpages this week for producing ‘original news reporting’. Chinese state-run Global Times newspaper’s columnist Shan Renping responds to the recent developments in the sphere of China’s online news reporting.
Chinese internet regulators have fined and shut down several major news site webpages this week for producing ‘original news reporting’. Chinese state-run Global Times newspaper’s columnist Shan Renping responds to the recent developments in the sphere of China’s online news reporting and its censorship.
China’s State Internet Information Office (北京市网信办) has halted the activities of several pages of China’s online news sites for violating national guidelines on spreading online information. The portals were allegedly ‘too independent’ in their reporting. News of the recent censorship came out on July 25 on Chinese official news sites such as People’s Daily.
One of the sites that was closed this week is Sina’s News Geek (极客新闻). But sites run by other Chinese media giants such as Sohu, iFeng, and Netease also went offline this week, along with their social media accounts.
“Commercial websites have no other option but to face existing rules on news reporting in China – for their own good and that of the country.”
Shan Renping (单仁平), widely regarded to be the pseudonym of Global Times’ editor-in-chief Hu Xijin, dedicated a special column to the issue in Global Times of July 26. Global Times is a state-run Chinese news outlet under the auspices of the People’s Daily.
In his latest editorial, Shan argues that commercial websites have no other option but to face existing rules on news reporting in China – for their own good and that of the country.
“Stopping websites from violating existing guidelines is a sensitive issue”, Shan writes, “as many of these platforms have become used to breaking through the managing stipulations. [Because] in society, there are many people who see this as an expression of ‘freedom of press’.”
Shan explains this existing ‘freedom of press’ as follows: “In the case of China, websites are first developed; the managing regulations catch up with them later.” This means that there can be a time that these websites operate in all freedom before they are stopped due their violation of existing laws.
In the current situation, Shan says, the guidelines have since long been determined in the ‘Supervisory Stipulations for Internet News Services’ (互联网新闻信息服务管理规定). Yet some websites were in clear violation of the 16th article in it.
The 16th article states that websites set up by “non-News Work Units” are not permitted to do their own reporting. Instead, they are required to follow the news stories that are published by media outlets that are part of China’s official media system (HRW 2006, 19).
“Profit-driven websites often lack the “ideological complexity” that is needed in today’s China.”
Shan says that the rise of commercial news sites has drastically changed China’s media environment – bringing much more vigor, but also much more problems. Commercial news outlets often have many financial and technical resources to become leaders within their field, but are less pressured to bear responsibility for the news they bring.
For most of China’s traditional media outlets, social responsibility is a main priority, Shan writes, but this makes it hard for them to compete with the new commercial websites and their “sensational headlines”.
Shan argues that Beijing’s guidelines on Internet News should be upheld and monitored – they have been compiled for good reasons by people experienced in the development of China’s internet. Moreover, Shan writes, profit-driven websites often lack the “ideological complexity” that is needed in today’s China.
He continues: “The news business has a strong political character and a major responsibility. Its organization and development has its own rules and logic under China’s political system. Any explorations of its reform should be in sync with the reforms of the nation at large.”
“Just as the world has thousands kinds of butterflies, it also has different societies where freedom of press has different functions and meanings.”
“When it comes to the supervision of news, the West has provided us with a ready-made concept: freedom of press. [But] it must be noted that China’s development is systematically different from the West. It is very difficult to take out a specific concept by itself and maintain its value and balance across different systems. Just as the world has thousands kinds of butterflies, it also has different societies where freedom of press has different functions and meanings.”
Shan encourages those sites that have been shut down to look at the bright side: “This might also be a new opportunity. Reform always comes with some sort of force. The question is how to use this ‘force’ to your advantage and join it.”
“Can there be no existence of alternate voices?”
One commenter who calls himself a ‘Friend of Global Times’ fully agrees with columnist Shan Renping: “Although they are commercial websites, they are still Chinese websites and shouldn’t become a platform for anti-Chinese trends. If there are not properly supervised, the consequences might be very grave.”
Although on Sina Weibo, many netizens are seemingly not too interested in the topic, many also see the recent developments as a good thing as they are tired of “a messy internet”, with too much web pages with “advertisements for games or shopping, and vulgar porn ads”, and “rumor-starting”.
But not all netizens think alike. “What does this all solve?” one commenter wonders: “Does it just mean to go with the Party, listen to the Party, and that there can be no existence of alternate voices?”
All in all, a seeming majority of Chinese netizens seem to understand China’s recent media clampdown: “Right now there are some independent media that are followed by many people, and they’re not after the truth but after eye-catchers. But they still lead public opinion – which is just not good.”
References
* Human Rights Watch. 2006. “”Race to the Bottom”: Corporate Complicity in Chinese Internet Censorship.” Volume 18 (Aug).
* Shan Renping. 2016. “商业网站或应面对新闻监管顺势而为 [commercial websites should face regulations and treat them as an opportunity]” Global Times, July 26 http://opinion.huanqiu.com/shanrenping/2016-07/9225316.html [26.07.16].
Manya is the founder and editor-in-chief of What's on Weibo, offering independent analysis of social trends, online media, and digital culture in China for over a decade. Subscribe to gain access to content, including the Weibo Watch newsletter, which provides deeper insights into the China trends that matter. More about Manya at manyakoetse.com or follow on X.
How K-pop Fans and the 13-Year-Old Daughter of Baidu VP Sparked a Debate on Online Privacy
What began as K-pop fan outrage targeting a snarky commenter quickly escalated into a Baidu-linked scandal and a broader conversation about data privacy on Chinese social media.
For an ordinary person with just a few followers, a Weibo account can sometimes be like a refuge from real life—almost like a private space on a public platform—where, along with millions of others, they can express dissatisfaction about daily annoyances or vent frustration about personal life situations.
But over recent years, even the most ordinary social media users could become victims of “opening the box” (开盒 kāihé)—the Chinese internet term for doxxing, meaning the deliberate leaking of personal information to expose or harass someone online.
A K-pop Fan-Led Online Witch Hunt
On March 12, a Chinese social media account focusing on K-pop content, Yuanqi Taopu Xuanshou (@元气桃浦选手), posted about Jang Wonyoung, a popular member of the Korean girl group IVE. As the South Korean singer and model attended Paris Fashion Week and then flew back the same day, the account suggested she was on a “crazy schedule.”
In the comment section, one female Weibo user nicknamed “Charihe” replied:
💬 “It’s a 12-hour flight and it’s not like she’s flying the plane herself. Isn’t sleeping in business class considered resting? Who says she can’t rest? What are you actually talking about by calling this a ‘crazy schedule’..”
Although the comment may have come across as a bit snarky, it was generally lighthearted and harmless. Yet unexpectedly, it brought disaster upon her.
That very evening, the woman nicknamed Charihe was bombarded with direct messages filled with insults from fans of Jang Wonyoung and IVE.
Ironically, Charihe’s profile showed she was anything but a hater of the pop star—her Weibo page included multiple posts praising Wonyoung’s beauty and charm. But that context was ignored by overzealous fans, who combed through her social media accounts looking for other posts to criticize, framing her as a terrible person.
After discovering through Charihe’s account that she was pregnant, Jang Wonyoung’s fans escalated their attacks by targeting her unborn child with insults.
The harassment did not stop there. Around midnight, fans doxxed Charihe, exposing her personal information, workplace, and the contact details of her family and friends. Her friends were flooded with messages, and some were even targeted at their workplaces.
Then, they tracked down Charihe’s husband’s WeChat account, sent him screenshots of her posts, and encouraged him to “physically punish” her.
The extremity of the online harassment finally drew backlash from netizens, who expressed concern for this ordinary pregnant woman’s situation:
💬 “Her entire life was exposed to people she never wanted to know about.”
💬 “Suffering this kind of attack during pregnancy is truly an undeserved disaster.”
Despite condemnation of the hate, some extreme self-proclaimed “fans” remained relentless in the online witch hunt against Charihe.
Baidu Takes a Hit After VP’s 13-Year-Old Daughter Is Exposed
One female fan, nicknamed “YourEyes” (@你的眼眸是世界上最小的湖泊), soon started doxxing commenters who had defended her. The speed and efficiency of these attacks left many stunned at just how easy it apparently is to trace social media users and doxx them.
Digging into old Weibo posts from the “YourEyes” account, people found she had repeatedly doxxed people on social media since last year, using various alt accounts.
She had previously also shared information claiming to study in Canada and boasted about her father’s monthly salary of 220,000 RMB (approx. $30.3K), along with a photo of a confirmation document.
Piecing together the clues, online sleuths finally identified her as the daughter of Xie Guangjun (谢广军), Vice President of Baidu.
From an online hate campaign against an innocent, snarky commenter, the case then became a headline in Chinese state media, and even made international headlines, after it was confirmed that the user “YourEyes”—who had been so quick to dig up others’ personal details—was in fact the 13-year-old daughter of Xie Guangjun, vice president at one of China’s biggest tech giants.
On March 17, Xie Guangjun posted the following apology to his WeChat Moments:
💬 “Recently, my 13-year-old daughter got into an online dispute. Losing control of her emotions, she published other people’s private information from overseas social platforms onto her own account. This led to her own personal information also getting exposed, triggering widespread negative discussion.
As her father, I failed to detect the problem in time and failed to guide her in how to properly handle the situation. I did not teach her the importance of respecting and protecting the privacy of others and of herself, for which I feel deep regret.
In response to this incident, I have communicated with my daughter and sternly criticized her actions. I hereby sincerely apologize to all friends affected.
As a minor, my daughter’s emotional and cognitive maturity is still developing. In a moment of impulsiveness, she made a wrong decision that hurt others and, at the same time, found herself caught in a storm of controversy that has subjected her to pressure and distress far beyond her age.
Here, I respectfully ask everyone to stop spreading related content and to give her the opportunity to correct her mistakes and grow.
Once again, I extend my apologies, and I sincerely thank everyone for your understanding and kindness.”
The public response to Xie’s apology has been largely negative. Many criticized the fact that it was posted privately on WeChat Moments rather than shared on a public platform like Weibo. Some dismissed the statement as an attempt to pacify Baidu shareholders and colleagues rather than take real accountability.
Netizens also pointed out that the apology avoided addressing the core issue of doxxing. Concerns were raised about whether Xie’s position at Baidu—and potential access to sensitive information—may have helped his daughter acquire the data she used to doxx others.
Adding fuel to the speculation were past conversations allegedly involving one of @YourEyes’ alt accounts. In one exchange, when asked “Who are you doxxing next?” she replied, “My parents provided the info,” with a friend adding, “The Baidu database can doxx your entire family.”
Following an internal investigation, Baidu’s head of security, Chen Yang (陈洋), stated on the company’s internal forum that Xie Guangjun’s daughter did not obtain data from Baidu but from “overseas sources.”
However, this clarification did little to reassure the public—and Baidu’s reputation has taken a hit. The company has faced prior scandals, most notably a the 2016 controversy over profiting from misleading medical advertisements.
Online Vulnerability
Beyond Baidu’s involvement, the incident reignited wider concerns about online privacy in China. “Even if it didn’t come from Baidu,” one user wrote, “the fact that a 13-year-old can access such personal information about strangers is terrifying.”
Using the hashtag “Reporter buys own confidential data” (#记者买到了自己的秘密#), Chinese media outlet Southern Metropolis Daily (@南方都市报) recently reported that China’s gray market for personal data has grown significantly. For just 300 RMB ($41), their journalist was able to purchase their own household registration data.
Further investigation uncovered underground networks that claim to cooperate with police, offering a “70-30 profit split” on data transactions.
These illegal data practices are not just connected to doxxing but also to widespread online fraud.
In response, some netizens have begun sharing guides on how to protect oneself from doxxing. For example, they recommend people disable phone number search on apps like WeChat and Alipay, hide their real name in settings, and avoid adding strangers, especially if they are active in fan communities.
Amid the chaos, K-pop fan wars continue to rage online. But some voices—such as influencer Jingzai (@一个特别虚荣的人)—have pointed out that the real issue isn’t fandom, but the deeper problem of data security.
💬 “You should question Baidu, question the telecom giants, question the government, and only then, fight over which fan group started this.”
As for ‘Charihe,’ whose comment sparked it all—her account is now gone. Her username has become a hashtag. For some, it’s still a target for online abuse. For others, it is a reminder of just how vulnerable every user is in a world where digital privacy is far from guaranteed.
Independently covering digital China for over a decade. Like what we do? Support us and get the story behind the hashtag by subscribing:
edited for clarity by Manya Koetse
Spotted a mistake or want to add something? Please let us know in comments below or email us. First-time commenters, please be patient – we will have to manually approve your comment before it appears.
🇨🇳 CHINA TRENDING WEEK 12: WHAT’S ON WEIBO SHORTS We include this content in the Weibo Watch newsletter. Subscribe to get it in your inbox 📩
Recently, Chinese netizens have started reaching out to Apple and its CEO Tim Cook in order to put pressure on a state-owned battery factory accused of violating labor laws.
The controversy involves the Huizhou factory of Desay Battery (德赛电池), known for producing lithium batteries for the high-end smartphone market, including Apple and Samsung. The factory caught netizens’ attention after a worker exposed in a video that his superiors were deducting three days of wages because he worked an 8-hour shift instead of the company’s “mandatory 10-hour on-duty.” Compulsory overtime violates China’s labor laws.
In response, the worker and other netizens started to let Apple know about the situation through email and social media, trying to put pressure on the factory by highlighting its position in the Apple supply chain. In at least one instance, Apple confirmed receipt of the complaint. (Meanwhile, on Tim Cook’s official Weibo account, the comment section underneath his most recent post is clearly being censored.)
Screenshot of replies on X underneath a post by Tim Cook on International Women’s Day.
The factory, however, has denied the allegations, , claiming that the video creator was spreading untruths and that they had reported him to authorities. His content has since also been removed. A staff member at Desay Battery maintained that they adhere to the 8-hour workday and appropriately compensate workers for overtime.
At the same time, Desay Battery issued an official statement, admitting to “management oversights regarding employee rights protection” (“保障员工权益的管理上存在疏漏”) and promising to do better in safeguarding employee rights.
One NetEase account (大风文字) suggested that for Chinese workers to effectively expose labor violations, reporting them to Western suppliers or EU regulators is an effective way to force domestic companies to respect labor laws.
Another commentary channel (上峰视点) was less optimistic about the effectiveness, arguing that companies like Apple would be quick to drop suppliers over product quality issues but more willing to turn a blind eye to labor violations—since cheap labor remains a key competitive advantage in Chinese manufacturing.
Spotted a mistake or want to add something? Please let us know in comments below or email us. First-time commenters, please be patient – we will have to manually approve your comment before it appears.
What’s on Weibo is run by Manya Koetse (@manyapan), offering independent analysis of social trends in China for over a decade. Subscribe to gain access to all content and get the Weibo Watch newsletter.